The last vote was 31-1, with the Cincinnati Bengals serving as the only lone dissenting vote, as the NFL owners approved fresh rights regulations on Tuesday that will allow private equity firms to purchase silent minority stakes in businesses.
The Brown family, which owns the staff, and the Bengals have not done this before. The majority of Cincinnati’s regular votes against NFL proposals are based on either the preservation of the status quo or issues about keeping up with big-market teams financially.
A request for comment was never received by the Bengals.
The Brown title is NFL nobility, owing to Paul Brown, who was co-founder, manager and predecessor of the Cleveland Browns, before he co-founded the Bengals in 1968 and served as their first coach. After his father passed away in 1991, Mike Brown took over the reins of the group. Mike’s girl Katie Blackburn, who is a Bengals professional, represented the group at the NFL owners meeting in Minnesota.

Brown has received criticism from numerous large-market owners who claim that he has not done much to increase revenue, from having a small sales force to no selling facility naming privileges until 2022, when Paycor replaced Paul Brown on the location façade. The Bengals were the least valuable ($ 4.71 billion ) and had the third lowest revenue ($ 554 million ) in Sportico’s NFL team valuations published earlier this month.
The Bengals and Buffalo Bills were the only lone dissenting vote in the users ‘ and people ‘ collective bargaining agreement in 2006. Although the deal introduced a revenue-sharing system to support low-revenue groups, Brown and Wilson believed that smaller businesses may also struggle with the rise in person costs brought on by the CBA.
Due to the delays it causes, Brown has been a frequent defender of video officiating review. The Bengals were one of three groups to cast a ballot against the Bengals ‘ transfer to digital review in 1999, which had been discontinued following the 1991 time following a six-year work. Brown was the hapless no vote when the NFL expanded record assessment in 2019. At the March 2019 users meetings, Brown declared,” I simply vote with my conscience and how I see it.” ” I’m not trying to be offensive. I am aware if someone else does n’t want things to go my way.
The NFL voted to end its shutdown legislation in 2015, which prohibited home games from being broadcast if the facility was never sold out. The 31-1 count when once found the Bengals on an area. Brown said he voted against the policy because he thought low-revenue groups were hampered by the revenue-sharing part of sharing customer wall records.
The Rams ‘ relocation from St. Louis to Los Angeles sparked controversies in the NFL, which led to a$ 90 million settlement for the town of St. Louis. Still, the 2016 NFL owners ‘ vote on the move was 30-2 in favor of it. Although Brown denied he voted against the walk, Arizona and Cincinnati were reportedly the vetoes in the room.
Unfortunately, the Bengals would seem to be a good candidate for personal capital investment. The Brown household is not very powerful outside of football, so hiring a silent PE investor may help the family as it struggles with potential estate issues. Paul Brown originally owned 10 % of the Bengals, but the family’s stake increased over the decades and reached 97 % in recent years.

The property tax rate has skyrocketed as the maximum amount for an NFL company has more than doubled in the past four years, but Mike Brown turned 89 next fortnight and wants to keep the family. And by now opening the doors to personal capital, it’s likely that the NFL brand values will rise even higher.
With guidance from Eben Novy-Williams.