This history appears in Sportico’s Morning Lead email. To sign up for a newsletter, visit here to sign up and receive it right in your box.
Reggie Bush, a former USC running up, was given the 2005 Heisman Trophy by the Heisman Trust, sparking a new debate over whether the NCAA if rescind Terrelle Pryor’s five-game suspension and reinstate his team’s 12 gets from the 2010 winter due to “tattoogate,” a controversy involving free tattoos.
Pryor makes a stronger explanation for the NCAA to take action than Bush. Pryor’s act was obviously NIL- related whereas Bush’s was murkier and, the NCAA contends in Bush v. NCAA, also prohibited by laws in 2024.
The NCAA suspended Pryor and four other team members for accepting unjustifiable perks as the Buckeyes prepared to face the Arkansas Razorbacks in the Sugar Bowl on January 4, 2011. About six months later, the school—under risk by the NCAA—vacated its 12 gets from the 2010 winter and its Sugar Bowl tournament. Go coach Jim Tressel was suspended, pushed up and faulted for not reporting on his people ‘ mistakes.

What were those offenses? By signing memorabilia at a tattoo parlor, the people had obtained “free” tattoos. Additionally, Pryor sold his 2008 Big Ten championship band and other paraphernalia, including a golden pants item to honor the Buckeyes ‘ victory over the Michigan Wolverines.
The punishments, which drew oversimplified headlines and stigmatized the gamers, were set to start the following school year. Instead, Pryor was selected for the 2011 NFL Supplemental Draft, but the club had already suspended him for five activities for “undermining the dignity of our review ready rules.” Pryor, who the Oakland Raiders had selected in the second round, had five games in his professional career ruined by the NFL’s effectively enforced NCAA penalty. In addition to playing for five NFL team for seven times, Pryor changed from a quarterback to a wide receiver.
Because the NCAA forbade players from using a lawful right they now had, the right to publicity, Pryor’s activities were simply considered transgressions. Although the state-specific right forbids the commercial use of someone else’s identity without their permission, it is generally known as” the right of another person.” Pro athletes are given the right to mark endorsement deals thanks to the publicity. It also plays a significant role in the leisure sector for actors, musicians, and other specialists whose renown provides opportunities for earning money.
Up until 2021, college athletes could face suspensions or also losing eligibility for their use of their promotion rights. People deemed unsuitable may lose their athletic fellowship, which could make remaining in college cost prohibitive.
Only after the NCAA failed to persuade Congress to act on its part and when position NIL statutes made it illegal for the NCAA to encroach on people ‘ right to attention, did the NCAA raise its limitations. At that point, school athletes could mark support, sponsor, influencing and another NIL deals—including tattoos in trade for autographs—without running foul of amateurism rules.

As noted by Cleveland .com, Pryor has used social media to lobby the NCAA to recover the Buckeyes ‘ achievements. In 2021, Pryor wrote on X,” The time has come]NCAA and Ohio State ] that we should get our wins back, records back and legacy of]Tressel ] back”. Although the NCAA’s reinstatement of successes” could not remove what we and our people endured for breaking laws that may n’t had existed in the first place,” Pryor claimed, it still would be a “huge step in the right direction.”
Bush’s potential NFL career was more important than his NIL-related issues. In 2010, the NCAA punished USC by, among other things, forcing it to abandon 14 activities in which Bush played during the 2004 and 2005 conditions. Bush, the second overall pick in the 2006 NFL Draft, was in his second NFL time by that point.
When Bush afterwards pursued the NFL, the NCAA came to the conclusion that he had accepted donations from would-be officials who sought to represent him, including on branding issues. So, the alleged presents were motivations to employ agents.
Bush is suing the NCAA for libel, stemming from an NCAA director saying in 2021 the organization also prohibits “pay- for- play kind arrangements”. Bush, who insists the NCAA’s analysis was flawed, did n’t run afoul of NCAA laws prohibiting “pay- for- perform” as that term is generally understood. The bills were intended to encourage him to play or stay at USC; they were more concerned with his prowess.
One protection for the NCAA is that it also forbids payments made by would-be brokers when those payments contemplate the depiction of players as pros. Bush might have gotten guidance from an Negligible representative in a world where NIL was permitted. However, the money in question was about Bush’s picture after he turned professional.
While Pryor’s situation is more on point with NIL, do n’t expect the NCAA to rewrite the history books for him, Bush or their schools.
The NCAA might point out that these participants were “guilty” of breaking the rules at the time of their participation. College sports are required to adhere to existing laws, even though Ed O’Bannon’s lawsuit against the NCAA later revealed that they were illegitimate and that they would change in 2021.
The legal structure follows the same fundamental rule. If the rules changes after a while, a person who is imprisoned for committing a crime is not immediately released. For instance, there are many people who remained jailed while states decriminalized and, in some cases, legalized pot. More measures, including national declarations that forgive marijuana possession offenses, have rewritten record, so to speak, for some.
The NCAA might be concerned about opening Pandora’s Box and being bombarded with requests to rewrite historical records and rescind awards, championships, and statistical accomplishments. When the NCAA makes a concession to a player or school that was disciplined prior to 2021 for NIL-related offenses, it sets a precedent and anticipates more demands.
Even so, Pryor makes the case that he was punished for abusing a right he already had as an American. Simply put, it is unlikely to influence the NCAA at all.